The COVID-19 Pass is Dead, Long Live the Global Digital Health Certification Network
It was never going away was it
You didn’t really think the Covid Pass had disappeared did you? Knowing my readers, I’m guessing you didn’t.
Yesterday, it was announced that the World Health Organization (WHO) has entered into an agreement with the European Union (EU) to use their digital COVID-19 certification system. This will be in order to establish a global system to “help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats, including pandemics”.
Going by the last few years, “global mobility” most likely means restricting the mobility of the unvaccinated and “protecting citizens” means only allowing vaccinated passengers to travel together.
The WHO says this is just the first building block in their Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN). WHO Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wants to offer all WHO Member States access to this digital health tool, which is based on “the principles of equity, innovation, transparency and data protection and privacy”.
Equity is an immediate red flag word, whilst transparency probably means telling everyone whether you are vaccinated or not.
Since the EU Covid Pass was launched it has issued more than 2.3 billion certificates. The certificates don’t only cover vaccination but also include tests and recovery. The EU claim it facilitated safe travel for citizens and supported Europe’s hard-hit tourism industry. It says that the passes allowed the coordinated lifting of restrictions from the moment it was possible.
The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation was set to expire at the end of June but never one to let a good crisis go to waste, the WHO has jumped in and will takeover the system this month. It then aims to progressively develop the system in the coming months.
Some might think that this will only be used for more regular vaccines. Think again. One of the first things the WHO will do with the new system is to converge digital COVID-19 certificates. This will mean all certificates will meet EU standards, validating digital signatures to prevent fraud.
The WHO says it won’t have any access to underlying personal data but national governments will.
Commenting on the latest news, Christine Anderson MEP said “During COVID, we have all been made into "potential threats" whose individual freedoms and rights must be curtailed to "protect society"!
Rob Roos MEP said “The #Coronapas is a discriminatory instrument that has only created a false sense of safety.”
and George Orwell said “Bloody hell, guys. It’s worse than I thought”.
This was never going away was it. The amount of money spent on it was one thing but the temptation to retain such a huge piece of bio-control over the population was another.
We wondered why the unvaccinated ICD-10 codes had been implemented. Another conspiracy theory come true.
You're right it was never going away -- that's why they threw so many billions of dollars at it.
It is all about injecting people with this BioNtech (Bio Nanotechnology) poison.
From my other comment from today:
The most important point is that it was NEVER a VIRUS that caused "Covid".
It was nanotechnology unleashed on unsuspecting people. The toxicity of nanotechnology, graphene and other carbon-based materials, quantum dots, etc. matches the symptoms of "Covid" and all the adverse reactions of BioNanoTechnology BioNTech so-called "vaccines."
People have been poisoned with nanotechnology in masks, tests, drugs, food, respirator filters, chemtrails/biocides and so on to inject them with BioNanoTechnology - nanotechnology.
So what " trials"? What virus? What "vaccines"? What "tests?" What "viral" "therapies"?
From top to bottom, it's all fraud - crime - deliberately inflicting death!
Everyone involved in perpetuating this GENOCIDE should be tried for MURDER.
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706753/
WORSE THAN ASBESTOS!!!
SWCNT (Carbon Nanotubes) (40 µg/mouse) were significantly more potent in inducing transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, a fibrogenic factor, than asbestos (120 µg/mouse).
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tox.20270
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-014-0059-z The carcinogenic effect of various multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) after intraperitoneal injection in rats
Results
Treatments induced tumors in all dose groups
All MWCNTs tested in this study showed a strong carcinogenic effect.
In the MWCNT A and B low- and high-dose groups and in the MWCNT C high-dose group, 80% of the animals died or were humanely killed due to a bad clinical condition. In the MWCNT C low-dose group, mortality reached 80% 16 months after the intraperitoneal treatment. The MWCNT D high-dose group showed 80% mortality after 23 months.
Rats in the MWCNT A groups developed a mesothelioma rate of 98% in the high-dose group and of 90% in the low-dose group.
In the MWCNT B groups, we found mesothelioma rates of 90% (high dose) and 92% (low dose).
Incidences of mesotheliomas in the MWCNT C groups were 94% after treatment with the high dose and 84% with the low dose.
Animals of the MWCNT D treatment groups developed malignant mesotheliomas in 70% (high dose) and 40% (low dose).
In the amosite asbestos group, the mesothelioma incidence was 66%
In the rats of the medium control group, we found one mesothelioma (2%) during final necropsies.
WHO unleashed this?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
The utility of Carbon nanotubes in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
This review encompasses the various biosensor and nanobiosensors employed in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prime focus of this review is to summarize and critically review the recent advancements in Carbon nanotubes-based biosensors for a spectrum of uses amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
YES, IT'S MURDER
THE RESULTS OF THESE STUDIES SHOW THAT EVEN A SINGLE EXPOSURE TO THESE TOXIC NANOMATERIALS IS ENOUGH TO CAUSE SERIOUS ADVERSE EFFECTS, INCLUDING DEATH.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies