How the BBC Reports on the Rogue Proteins Produced by mRNA Vaccines

A negative story spun into a positive

A short post tonight as I’m not at my desk.

I’m sure you have all read various articles on the recent study that showed one in four people who had Pfizer jabs experienced unintended immune responses. In fact it was between 25 and 30%. And by unintended immune responses I mean that there was a glitch in how the body ‘read’ the mRNA and instead of producing the Covid spike protein produced a completely different spike protein, to which the body reacted.

With all that we know about the actual spike protein maybe that wasn’t such a bad thing. But in reality, getting your body to produce strange, mutant proteins can never be good. More about this in another post.

I wonder how many of the general public would have rolled up their sleeves if they were told that one in three of them might start producing nonsensical proteins? Again more on this in another post along with the failure of the regulatory bodies to even look for this problem.

The Telegraph article which reported on the problem was littered with the usual safe and effective phrases:

• “glitch but no adverse effects”;

• “No adverse effects were created by the error”;

• “the end result is a harmless protein”;

• “The code relating to the Covid vaccines was harmless and no issues were created”;

• “Research has shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is safe. Billions of doses of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered, saving lives worldwide”;

• “This technology is amazing…but we’ve just made it a whole lot safer going forward”;

• “The Covid vaccines are very, very safe and very, very efficacious”;

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Interestingly, they say the findings were shared with medicines regulator MHRA around a year ago. Is this when the pressure to get vaccinated suddenly disappeared? Did they realise what a mistake they had made?

Whilst the article claims that your body creating nonsensical proteins is fine and safe, there is no way that they know this. It is a complete lie to claim that it is safe and reinforces one of the major arguments many of us had for not getting vaccinated - that there was no medium or long term safety data. Only a time machine could have proved that the vaccine was safe, however many trials were undertaken in parallel.

The Telegraph article concludes by saying that fixing the issue massively de-risks the platform going forward. De-risks? I thought it was completely safe?

As I say, I will go into more detail on a lot of the points above in another article. However, I wanted to see if the BBC would report on the issue and how they would report it.

Surprisingly they did report on it but managed to completely spin the story into a positive one. Not really a shock there.

The title was “mRNA vaccines could be fine-tuned” which doesn’t even sound like anything was wrong in the first place.

It begins by saying that “the jab could be tweaked to avoid a harmless tiny “slip” sometimes seen as the body reads the code”. As I say, there is no way anybody can know it is harmless, it is not a ‘tiny’ slip and ‘sometimes seen’ actually means around one third of the time!

"Existing mRNA vaccines are effective and safe”. Can they write one article on vaccines without that phrase!?

“the mRNA shots…have protected millions of lives”. There is so much sycophantic, vaccine loving guff that it is hard to actually find the real story. Especially for people that don’t read about these topics all the time. But I guess that is why it is written that way.

“The end result is still great protection - but there can be a few extra, unintended proteins made too”. Don’t worry about it, everything is fine.

“Thankfully, these cause no physical issues” using the millions of the people around the world who have been vaccinated as their proof. So what about all the vaccine injuries? They just didn’t happen, right?

“Had there been any problems, they would have been spotted early on”. Ha Ha ha ha ha!

One of the reasons I think this study actually made it to the BBC is the last part of the article. “The researchers found a simple tweak to some of the code could eradicate these errors”.

Before we get to the point we get a few more “Research has shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against Covid-19 is safe. Billions of does of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered, saving lives worldwide”.

"Easy fix”. This easy fix means that future mRNA vaccines would use slip-resistant coding. “It is scientifically possible some unintended proteins might be capable of triggering an unwanted immune response or side effect”. Wait a minute, I thought the main part of the article said it wouldn’t!? Anyway, the easy fix is fortunately found in the new self-amplifying vaccines they are desperate for us all to have.

Again, more about this in another post but these self-amplifying vaccines give the body instructions to replicate the mRNA, amplifying the amount of protein made.

On that happy note, enjoy your Friday evening and make sure you read the BBC if you want to learn how to spin a story!