Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I am quite comfortable releasing my name I am Natalie K Björklund-Gordon. I retired early because my husband is older than I am and we wanted to enjoy his retirement together. I no longer apply for grants, need to be on academic committees or publish to avoid perishing (though I just did just submit yet another paper in an unrelated field for peer review.) There is very little anyone can do to cancel me that has not already been done because of my views on climate change. (No I am not a true believer in carbon taxes.) Has anyone else noticed a lot of the criticism has come from us retirees who are insulated from cancel culture?
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Thank you for sharing these personal remarks. While I'm still active in academia and not in the STEM fields (tenured faculty in the Humanities), I feel competent enough at *reading* bespoke studies to have concluded in the likewise manner.
Now, my wife, our two kids, and I all 'tested positive' for Covid in early January 2022, and for the past year we also felt pushed into a corner of society that was, frankly, uncomfortable and wrong.
Just two days ago, I had a spare-time conversation with someone who also elected to forego the 'vaccines', overheard by an elderly septuagenarian who asked us to leave 'for the sake of her husband who's at high-risk' (of course, the husband was triple-jabbed). Talk about 'shame by association'.
I did give her a mouthful of my opinions, but my conversation partner and I elected to leave the room a few minutes before we were supposed to. Nothing is changing these minds, it's almost as if they're all brainwashed.
I very much sympathise with you and your experiences, and I hope you will stay strong on your convictions.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
No special training, education or experience in science, medicine, epidemiology or anything related, but I knew instinctively before the “vaccine” came out that there was no way in hell I was going to take anything so rushed, w/ short & long term effects COMPLETELY unknown, & w/out proper trials normally taking years.
Couple that w/ all of the “safe & effective” BS from the very start, knowing that there was no one on the planet, no matter the related “expertise,” who could honestly say or believe that….
And finally, the GLOBAL lockstep to “vax” every person on the planet as the SOLE solution, the immediate instigation of masks, lockdowns, banning of cheap therapeutics, demonization of experts w/ a different opinion & ignoring / denying naturally acquired immunity - in fact, if one believes this started circulating as early as summer 2019 (& I do), this thing had ripped through the world almost w/out notice by March 2020 - 6+ months later - when the world went mad over something w/ a 99.7% survivability for the vast majority, globally.
It doesn’t take any special training or experience to know I wanted no part of this. And I’ve held my line.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
"The first real red flag can be found in Table 2, page 18. There were 311 cases excluded for protocol deviations. only 60 placebos were excluded. Fives times as many cases had been excluded. Those two numbers should have been the same. Why were five times as many cases excluded as controls for protocol deviation? I recall thinking at the time ‘What was the protocol deviation? Did they die?”. That's mind blowing to me. If fraud can be shown an easy place to find it in the trial is in the exclusion numbers. Pfizer could have literally been hiding the bodies...an alternative is that some people were so vaccine injured from the first dose that they could not continue with the second. Either way it's no good!
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Thanks so much for sharing. I’m not a scientist so have to rely on others interpretation of studies and data and knowing who to trust in that regard is difficult. I tell you who I don’t trust. Big Pharma.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Great one. She also gave a spoiler for part IV or V of the hypothesis I am working on. People will come to see using that spike was the dumbest mistake in human history. It's a shame, becuasr mRNA had massive promises, and when this thing blows apart, nobody will ever want to use the tech for vaccines.
Reader analysis was honest and similar to many like us.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Would also like to see her thoughts on the Pfizer 6 month trial study, that must have substantiated her fears even more, like the over 1200 dead in vaccine group. This death rate is higher than covid!
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Personally , I love that Natalie identified herself and the fact that she has nothing to lose at this point in her life . I see so many articles written about this current situation without any names , that I see how they can be deemed not credible . Just in awe of such brave credible people like Natalie who are giving their opinions in the face of such massive censorship . Maria Ressa wasn't off with her view of totalitarianism taking over the world view. It is way beyond the vaccine data at this point, in my opinion.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
it is very obvious from what we knew then and know now, that Pfizer and probably the rest, committed purly fraudulent testing and evaluation to get these "vaccines" across the finish line. The FDA clearly conspired with them to do so. Why else is FDA attempting to hide all their data, evaluations, and reports for 75 years?
Feb 7, 2022·edited Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
My thoughts exactly. I also reviewed all the data Pfizer put out early on, especially the reverse transcriptase. I did not take the experimental genetic injection either. I am now focused on keeping my adult children and grandchildren safe from the covid crazy public school system. FYI the WHO has/had a document that stated "IMPLIED Consent" if you send your child to school on a Vax pop up clinic day. The Superintendant stated to me that public schools that recieve/accept federal covid monies are trumped by such documents and I can personally attest to the covid clown world psychotic nature of the nurses within the public school system. I have been singled out by them. They only know my voice by telephone, I think, although the PoPo have been called on me once for prsenting factual documents MY college professors. They have All drank the whole pitcher of purple Kool Aid.
Feb 7, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Thanks a lot for the writing from a higly educated person who knowns what she writes about. During the time since Covid-19 have read, and still read books about viruses an vaccines. During decades I have said that vaccine has no parallel, no connection to nature.
I am quite comfortable releasing my name I am Natalie K Björklund-Gordon. I retired early because my husband is older than I am and we wanted to enjoy his retirement together. I no longer apply for grants, need to be on academic committees or publish to avoid perishing (though I just did just submit yet another paper in an unrelated field for peer review.) There is very little anyone can do to cancel me that has not already been done because of my views on climate change. (No I am not a true believer in carbon taxes.) Has anyone else noticed a lot of the criticism has come from us retirees who are insulated from cancel culture?
Thank you for sharing these personal remarks. While I'm still active in academia and not in the STEM fields (tenured faculty in the Humanities), I feel competent enough at *reading* bespoke studies to have concluded in the likewise manner.
Now, my wife, our two kids, and I all 'tested positive' for Covid in early January 2022, and for the past year we also felt pushed into a corner of society that was, frankly, uncomfortable and wrong.
Just two days ago, I had a spare-time conversation with someone who also elected to forego the 'vaccines', overheard by an elderly septuagenarian who asked us to leave 'for the sake of her husband who's at high-risk' (of course, the husband was triple-jabbed). Talk about 'shame by association'.
I did give her a mouthful of my opinions, but my conversation partner and I elected to leave the room a few minutes before we were supposed to. Nothing is changing these minds, it's almost as if they're all brainwashed.
I very much sympathise with you and your experiences, and I hope you will stay strong on your convictions.
No special training, education or experience in science, medicine, epidemiology or anything related, but I knew instinctively before the “vaccine” came out that there was no way in hell I was going to take anything so rushed, w/ short & long term effects COMPLETELY unknown, & w/out proper trials normally taking years.
Couple that w/ all of the “safe & effective” BS from the very start, knowing that there was no one on the planet, no matter the related “expertise,” who could honestly say or believe that….
And finally, the GLOBAL lockstep to “vax” every person on the planet as the SOLE solution, the immediate instigation of masks, lockdowns, banning of cheap therapeutics, demonization of experts w/ a different opinion & ignoring / denying naturally acquired immunity - in fact, if one believes this started circulating as early as summer 2019 (& I do), this thing had ripped through the world almost w/out notice by March 2020 - 6+ months later - when the world went mad over something w/ a 99.7% survivability for the vast majority, globally.
It doesn’t take any special training or experience to know I wanted no part of this. And I’ve held my line.
"The first real red flag can be found in Table 2, page 18. There were 311 cases excluded for protocol deviations. only 60 placebos were excluded. Fives times as many cases had been excluded. Those two numbers should have been the same. Why were five times as many cases excluded as controls for protocol deviation? I recall thinking at the time ‘What was the protocol deviation? Did they die?”. That's mind blowing to me. If fraud can be shown an easy place to find it in the trial is in the exclusion numbers. Pfizer could have literally been hiding the bodies...an alternative is that some people were so vaccine injured from the first dose that they could not continue with the second. Either way it's no good!
Thanks so much for sharing. I’m not a scientist so have to rely on others interpretation of studies and data and knowing who to trust in that regard is difficult. I tell you who I don’t trust. Big Pharma.
The devil is in the detail, like categorised unvaxxed people die after getting the first jab.
Great one. She also gave a spoiler for part IV or V of the hypothesis I am working on. People will come to see using that spike was the dumbest mistake in human history. It's a shame, becuasr mRNA had massive promises, and when this thing blows apart, nobody will ever want to use the tech for vaccines.
Reader analysis was honest and similar to many like us.
Would also like to see her thoughts on the Pfizer 6 month trial study, that must have substantiated her fears even more, like the over 1200 dead in vaccine group. This death rate is higher than covid!
Personally , I love that Natalie identified herself and the fact that she has nothing to lose at this point in her life . I see so many articles written about this current situation without any names , that I see how they can be deemed not credible . Just in awe of such brave credible people like Natalie who are giving their opinions in the face of such massive censorship . Maria Ressa wasn't off with her view of totalitarianism taking over the world view. It is way beyond the vaccine data at this point, in my opinion.
it is very obvious from what we knew then and know now, that Pfizer and probably the rest, committed purly fraudulent testing and evaluation to get these "vaccines" across the finish line. The FDA clearly conspired with them to do so. Why else is FDA attempting to hide all their data, evaluations, and reports for 75 years?
My thoughts exactly. I also reviewed all the data Pfizer put out early on, especially the reverse transcriptase. I did not take the experimental genetic injection either. I am now focused on keeping my adult children and grandchildren safe from the covid crazy public school system. FYI the WHO has/had a document that stated "IMPLIED Consent" if you send your child to school on a Vax pop up clinic day. The Superintendant stated to me that public schools that recieve/accept federal covid monies are trumped by such documents and I can personally attest to the covid clown world psychotic nature of the nurses within the public school system. I have been singled out by them. They only know my voice by telephone, I think, although the PoPo have been called on me once for prsenting factual documents MY college professors. They have All drank the whole pitcher of purple Kool Aid.
In the end Covid will turn out be the greatest shaggy dog ever told.
When I heard about the miracle vaccine I did some research and found this https://www.wired.com/2003/05/feds-race-to-make-sars-vaccine/
This is what is now technically termed “misinformation”. It definitely makes you wonder what the bar is to express a legitimately dissenting opinion…
an excellent read. vaccines that do not provide immunity are not vaccines. The question now is what are they ???
Thanks a lot for the writing from a higly educated person who knowns what she writes about. During the time since Covid-19 have read, and still read books about viruses an vaccines. During decades I have said that vaccine has no parallel, no connection to nature.