Despite all the doom-mongering, the paper reported what we all know - the cold kills far more people than the heat does. In fact, it kills around 10 times more people. In the 854 urban areas in Europe, 203,620 people died from the cold and 20,173 from the heat. This corresponds to 129 per 100,000 person-years for the cold and 13 per 100,000 person-years for the heat.
But there is a narrative to maintain - the world is burning up.
So, when presenting their results, the chart that was shown was as follows:
It looks as though heat deaths are almost as bad as cold deaths. However, if you look closely, that’s because they have changed the axis for the heat related excess death rate.
When the axis on the right is redrawn (h/t Bjorn Lomborg) so that it is the same as the one on the left, you get a chart that looks like this.
But I guess that isn’t as scary and won’t stop you driving your car or going on holiday.
The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Yipe, that's... not good. That it is The Lancet publishing it without apparent comment or telling to the authors to get their shit together and stop cheating is just a splash of vomit on the turd-cake.
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The fact that The Lancet published this without comment shows either that they are incompetent or they are corrupt. Neither option is acceptable for a supposedly reputable organization.
They have taken down multiple articles dealing with the Covid vaccines on very questionable grounds but they let this slide.
This is blatant propaganda and they should be called on it.......
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Bad, but not nearly as bad as the Lancet HCQ Hydroxychloroquine fraud study, check this video out. Probably over a million people died because of this fraud. Lancet deserves far more than the $billion lawsuit over the obsolete Dominion Scam Voting machines or the Alex Jones $500M Sandy Hook hurt feelings lawsuit. Listen here for the sordid story @38m12s in this video:
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH - IMPORTANT, COMPLETE AND GREAT INTERVIEW MAY 19, 2021:
And then there was the Covid Proximal Origin absolute garbage work of fiction published in Peer Reviewed Journal, Nature, just shows how corrupted the Peer Review process is. Nature should sued and pay $millions in damages for publishing that unvetted schlock article that did not disclose EXTREME conflicts of interest of its authors, that alone is obscene for any Science Journal.
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It’s frankly stunning how DESPERATELY they’re trying to turn normally-hot summer temps EVERYWHERE in the world into “the next big thing”, an abnormality beyond measure & advising staying home & wearing masks! Phoenix, AZ with multiple days of 110 or more...I’m an AZ native & newsflash: it’s f’ing hot there in summer & it’s hot or warmer everywhere else that is having “summer” right now.
Jul 25, 2023·edited Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
i’m asking myself: is the problem with the graph really them or is it us — the avg joe — who is unable to see through shit? i mean it’s not like they omitted the axis labels…
and: it’s the lancet. the same shit show that published bullshit and cancelled people with data against the narratives for 3 years now. we know what operation this is.
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
There has definitely been a pivot from COVID-19 to Climate scare tactics. How long will people put up with this BS. Keeping people scared and anxious is bad for their health, mental health and for society. Do these nudge agents want to destabilise Western society or are they just mad scientist who like to play gods and minions?
However ludicrous the claims, they serve both to destabilise and create fear if believed and also test for push-back from the general public.
Also I suppose a test for the news readers and everyone in the media and the journals: if they don't burst out laughing or throw the dodgy papers out, they are as complicit as those who cook up the fake stories.
Jul 25, 2023·edited Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Cutting off the x-axis on the right side where the heat related deaths are occuring is clearly a sign of manipulation so that you a get a distorted view of the overvall data. The normal averge Joe will not notice this and would feel entitled in his brain-washed mind.
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It is just science .... or rather, what used to be known as an apparently fairly trustworthy sector of humanity is now propagandized just like everything else. I recall the quote not so long ago, something to the effect of "I am the science"
Was further introduced to this notion while reading one of Graham Hancock's more recent works wherein he discussed how 'the science' essentially glossed over the fact that early America was populated by somewhat modern civilizations far longer into the past they they cared to admit, sweeping evidence of the same under the rug for decades, if not centuries.
Speaking of possibly corrupt, formerly distinguished, medical journals, did the Editor of the BMJ ever respond to Prof Angus Dalgleish's open letter regarding his experience of observing apparently vaxx-related turbo-cancers ?
And has a single MP responded positively to the 'Perseus' Report ? Or did that, to, die in The Void?
Yes they were very disingenuous and slimy. But the deeper reality here is that very few of these deaths are caused by heat or cold. The implication that a temperature change would save more than a few of these lives is very dubious. Yes, hammer them for their lying graph. But don't give them a pass on data harvesting to claim causation that isn't credible.
We've known for a while now that the Lancet was one of the propagandist captured journals, so this is hardly surprising, but it DOES add more to the evidence of the corruption so that at least is a good thing.
I understand the reason it is in order. What I don't understand is why you have it all documented. Is it part of your job or just a personal interest? It must have taken a long time to collate all that info.
We all know what is going on. The observer changes what is being observed. The Hawthorne effect occurs when people behave differently because they know they are being watched. In physics, Erwin Schrödinger’s famous cat highlights the power of observation. - https://fs.blog/observer-effect/ So even if your MP does not respond to your well written letter on an important matter (I am presently waiting for a response), rest assured that by merely sending it it has changed something for the better in the Universe - even if your MP does not read it (but I think he will).
Yipe, that's... not good. That it is The Lancet publishing it without apparent comment or telling to the authors to get their shit together and stop cheating is just a splash of vomit on the turd-cake.
The fact that The Lancet published this without comment shows either that they are incompetent or they are corrupt. Neither option is acceptable for a supposedly reputable organization.
They have taken down multiple articles dealing with the Covid vaccines on very questionable grounds but they let this slide.
This is blatant propaganda and they should be called on it.......
Yahbut it's a Peer Reviewed Journal so anything they say is "The Science".
They were NOT “reputable” during WuFlu & probably well before that, Mark
Which is exactly the reason why I typed the word “supposedly” before the word “reputable” as in:
“Neither option is acceptable for a SUPPOSEDLY reputable organization “
Because this is so egregious and bizarre and NOT SCIENCE, I went and looked at the graph for myself.
What an absolute load of horse manure.
These people are just plain evil.
And they wonder why no one trusts them anymore.
I don’t even have words.
Bad, but not nearly as bad as the Lancet HCQ Hydroxychloroquine fraud study, check this video out. Probably over a million people died because of this fraud. Lancet deserves far more than the $billion lawsuit over the obsolete Dominion Scam Voting machines or the Alex Jones $500M Sandy Hook hurt feelings lawsuit. Listen here for the sordid story @38m12s in this video:
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH - IMPORTANT, COMPLETE AND GREAT INTERVIEW MAY 19, 2021:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vM0Yr1uCQoL0/
And then there was the Covid Proximal Origin absolute garbage work of fiction published in Peer Reviewed Journal, Nature, just shows how corrupted the Peer Review process is. Nature should sued and pay $millions in damages for publishing that unvetted schlock article that did not disclose EXTREME conflicts of interest of its authors, that alone is obscene for any Science Journal.
So much for "Peer Reviewed Journals".
Nature is owned by the CCP, whom paid for the propaganda to secure more NIH funding for the Wuhan Lab, which is brilliant.
This is CLEALY DISINFORMATION. WHERE THE HELL ARE THE CENSORS THEY WANT US TO HAVE?
Oh no, don’t let the Globalists figure this out! They’re going to have to change their whole agenda…AGAIN!
It’s frankly stunning how DESPERATELY they’re trying to turn normally-hot summer temps EVERYWHERE in the world into “the next big thing”, an abnormality beyond measure & advising staying home & wearing masks! Phoenix, AZ with multiple days of 110 or more...I’m an AZ native & newsflash: it’s f’ing hot there in summer & it’s hot or warmer everywhere else that is having “summer” right now.
I wonder when it all becomes “mandatory”....
The Kansas Dept of Health pulled the same stunt when comparing masked counties to unmasked. They were busted by the Wall Street Journal:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/kansas-democrats-covid-chart-masks-the-truth-11598483406?st=sueypk34h9ley52&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
Isn't this an academic fraud? We should dig up the authors' other papers, even PhD theses, to validate their work.
Have the Lancet been asked to comment on the blatant attempt to deceive?
Research funded by UK Medical Research Council (UK Govt) and EU (Horizon Europe). What more -trusted- sources could you wish for?
i’m asking myself: is the problem with the graph really them or is it us — the avg joe — who is unable to see through shit? i mean it’s not like they omitted the axis labels…
and: it’s the lancet. the same shit show that published bullshit and cancelled people with data against the narratives for 3 years now. we know what operation this is.
There has definitely been a pivot from COVID-19 to Climate scare tactics. How long will people put up with this BS. Keeping people scared and anxious is bad for their health, mental health and for society. Do these nudge agents want to destabilise Western society or are they just mad scientist who like to play gods and minions?
However ludicrous the claims, they serve both to destabilise and create fear if believed and also test for push-back from the general public.
Also I suppose a test for the news readers and everyone in the media and the journals: if they don't burst out laughing or throw the dodgy papers out, they are as complicit as those who cook up the fake stories.
Cutting off the x-axis on the right side where the heat related deaths are occuring is clearly a sign of manipulation so that you a get a distorted view of the overvall data. The normal averge Joe will not notice this and would feel entitled in his brain-washed mind.
The Pied Paper of Hamlin is thought to have been a real event. The original story is here recounted. It has much to teach us about trickery - https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/pied-piper-hamelin-001969
Thanks, really interesting
I saw that chart by Bjorn yesterday - the mainstream climate narrative is 100% fraudulent
Can someone explain how the axis was changed?
the axis for cold deaths goes up in 50s, heat deaths in 10s. So on the graph 10 heat deaths looks the same as 50 cold deaths.
OIC! (Somehow I was looking at the end points of 250)
Great catch. Linking this tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
Excellent replotting of the data
BTW, if you want to know what is really going on and why, check out the documentary, Saving capitalism, on Netflix.
It is just science .... or rather, what used to be known as an apparently fairly trustworthy sector of humanity is now propagandized just like everything else. I recall the quote not so long ago, something to the effect of "I am the science"
Was further introduced to this notion while reading one of Graham Hancock's more recent works wherein he discussed how 'the science' essentially glossed over the fact that early America was populated by somewhat modern civilizations far longer into the past they they cared to admit, sweeping evidence of the same under the rug for decades, if not centuries.
I must say it as it is: What motherfuckers! Manipulation of the graph is not cheating but it is criminal.
Speaking of possibly corrupt, formerly distinguished, medical journals, did the Editor of the BMJ ever respond to Prof Angus Dalgleish's open letter regarding his experience of observing apparently vaxx-related turbo-cancers ?
And has a single MP responded positively to the 'Perseus' Report ? Or did that, to, die in The Void?
I'm not holding my breathe.......
Well, as Mark Twain said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics."
Yes they were very disingenuous and slimy. But the deeper reality here is that very few of these deaths are caused by heat or cold. The implication that a temperature change would save more than a few of these lives is very dubious. Yes, hammer them for their lying graph. But don't give them a pass on data harvesting to claim causation that isn't credible.
Pretty blatant huh?
I didn't even look more below on the graph because the writers are so inept that they want to show you an 85+ age group with a sign of <85.
We've known for a while now that the Lancet was one of the propagandist captured journals, so this is hardly surprising, but it DOES add more to the evidence of the corruption so that at least is a good thing.
Editorial pointers for The Lancet, courtesy of The Father of Lies
The Lancet WAS a reputable publication. Phooey.
Misrepresenting data to promote a narrative that they want us to believe is "the science." Nonsense.
Only makes the aware consumer wonder what else they are willing to do.
That is so unethical and wrong! You wouldn’t mark that correct in a high school science paper.
That's a lot of work. Why do you have it all organised?
I understand the reason it is in order. What I don't understand is why you have it all documented. Is it part of your job or just a personal interest? It must have taken a long time to collate all that info.
Feel free to fill me in
Ok, still need a bit more to work on - I'm obv a bit slow!
why do you need to delete?
keep going
what's the link?
We all know what is going on. The observer changes what is being observed. The Hawthorne effect occurs when people behave differently because they know they are being watched. In physics, Erwin Schrödinger’s famous cat highlights the power of observation. - https://fs.blog/observer-effect/ So even if your MP does not respond to your well written letter on an important matter (I am presently waiting for a response), rest assured that by merely sending it it has changed something for the better in the Universe - even if your MP does not read it (but I think he will).